<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wind Turbines: Bad for the Environment?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://soulofthecities.net/2009/04/wind-turbines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://soulofthecities.net/2009/04/wind-turbines/</link>
	<description>Soul of The Cities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 07:33:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ashlin</title>
		<link>http://soulofthecities.net/2009/04/wind-turbines/#comment-688</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 20:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soulofthecities.net/?p=7758#comment-688</guid>
		<description>Tell me Joel, is it really bliss?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell me Joel, is it really bliss?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://soulofthecities.net/2009/04/wind-turbines/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soulofthecities.net/?p=7758#comment-202</guid>
		<description>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
Now we can&#039;t build wind turbines because of imaginary damage to imaginary things? We are so doomed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!<br />
Now we can&#8217;t build wind turbines because of imaginary damage to imaginary things? We are so doomed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Miejan</title>
		<link>http://soulofthecities.net/2009/04/wind-turbines/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Miejan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 22:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soulofthecities.net/?p=7758#comment-61</guid>
		<description>This article does not include the full text of the author&#039;s report. Perhaps suggestions are included in the full report. Don&#039;t forget to visit the video on Youtube also. See the links at the end of the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article does not include the full text of the author&#8217;s report. Perhaps suggestions are included in the full report. Don&#8217;t forget to visit the video on Youtube also. See the links at the end of the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chanda</title>
		<link>http://soulofthecities.net/2009/04/wind-turbines/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Chanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 21:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soulofthecities.net/?p=7758#comment-60</guid>
		<description>I agree with both Jessica and Kathie. I really don&#039;t think Mother Earth would object to having some assistance in alleviating all the other pressures on her by sacrificing a powerful resource such as wind. It is unsettling to think that the use of wind would affect the Earth&#039;s chi, however it is something that is already in existence that harnesses massive amounts of energy. I agree, we have to start somewhere. There is a give and take process to the healing of the planet. I also agree that some additional suggestions would be of the utmost help for those of us left a little empty by this article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with both Jessica and Kathie. I really don&#8217;t think Mother Earth would object to having some assistance in alleviating all the other pressures on her by sacrificing a powerful resource such as wind. It is unsettling to think that the use of wind would affect the Earth&#8217;s chi, however it is something that is already in existence that harnesses massive amounts of energy. I agree, we have to start somewhere. There is a give and take process to the healing of the planet. I also agree that some additional suggestions would be of the utmost help for those of us left a little empty by this article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica Rains</title>
		<link>http://soulofthecities.net/2009/04/wind-turbines/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica Rains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 08:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soulofthecities.net/?p=7758#comment-55</guid>
		<description>I agree on what Kathie wrote. The whole point of wind turbines is to stop the usage of coal and gasoline and highly wasteful nuclear power plants for energy, which have been the main cause of polar ice cap melting, global warming, etc.

As your article suggest then wouldn&#039;t also cities and tall buildings also disrupt prana? Then perhaps it isn&#039;t just pollution but that the entire planet is disrupting prana flow from the building and growth of cities, large and small.

I think that even if wind turbines end up being the less favorable method of producing and storing massive amounts of energy to be used by the public, it is a VERY good thing that we&#039;re at least trying other methods, starting with wind turbines. I personally think solar power is the way to go, but they still haven&#039;t found adequate ways of storing and utelizing the immense amount of energy that they pick up each day, rain or shine, and also solar panels are quite expensive. Wind turbines on the other hand, you need to have MANY of them to get real useage out of them.

Could it possibly be that instead of disrupting the prana from the earth, they are actually just pouring out immense amount of energy and perhaps that is what you are picking up? I know that I get headaches if I am near a petroleum plant or a nuclear power plant - I think it&#039;s jsut the energy coming from the place itself is so dense that it overwhelmes your senses.

At any rate, even if the ultimate safest way to produce and store energy is NOT wind turbines, we&#039;re trying to find other and better ways and trying is better than settling on what we&#039;ve always done in the past don&#039;t you think? Just like when you first start to learn how to cook for yourself. You don&#039;t always get it right the first time around but the more you try new things the better you get at it and the healthier your meals get. There is a biiig big picture we&#039;re looking at here, and I think this is actually a good step that we&#039;re taking. Human kind is TRYING to be more sensitive to the earth and is trying new things, eventually we&#039;ll get it! Have some faith! Don&#039;t be protesting the learning, evolving process here please~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree on what Kathie wrote. The whole point of wind turbines is to stop the usage of coal and gasoline and highly wasteful nuclear power plants for energy, which have been the main cause of polar ice cap melting, global warming, etc.</p>
<p>As your article suggest then wouldn&#8217;t also cities and tall buildings also disrupt prana? Then perhaps it isn&#8217;t just pollution but that the entire planet is disrupting prana flow from the building and growth of cities, large and small.</p>
<p>I think that even if wind turbines end up being the less favorable method of producing and storing massive amounts of energy to be used by the public, it is a VERY good thing that we&#8217;re at least trying other methods, starting with wind turbines. I personally think solar power is the way to go, but they still haven&#8217;t found adequate ways of storing and utelizing the immense amount of energy that they pick up each day, rain or shine, and also solar panels are quite expensive. Wind turbines on the other hand, you need to have MANY of them to get real useage out of them.</p>
<p>Could it possibly be that instead of disrupting the prana from the earth, they are actually just pouring out immense amount of energy and perhaps that is what you are picking up? I know that I get headaches if I am near a petroleum plant or a nuclear power plant &#8211; I think it&#8217;s jsut the energy coming from the place itself is so dense that it overwhelmes your senses.</p>
<p>At any rate, even if the ultimate safest way to produce and store energy is NOT wind turbines, we&#8217;re trying to find other and better ways and trying is better than settling on what we&#8217;ve always done in the past don&#8217;t you think? Just like when you first start to learn how to cook for yourself. You don&#8217;t always get it right the first time around but the more you try new things the better you get at it and the healthier your meals get. There is a biiig big picture we&#8217;re looking at here, and I think this is actually a good step that we&#8217;re taking. Human kind is TRYING to be more sensitive to the earth and is trying new things, eventually we&#8217;ll get it! Have some faith! Don&#8217;t be protesting the learning, evolving process here please~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathie Noga</title>
		<link>http://soulofthecities.net/2009/04/wind-turbines/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathie Noga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 19:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soulofthecities.net/?p=7758#comment-38</guid>
		<description>I read the article on wind turbines.  The author does not offer a better alternative to wind energy.  Does he favor solar energy or something else?  What about the energy involved with air pollution associated with air pollution from fossil fuels?  I am environmentally sensitive and only know all too personally the health effects of fossil fuels.  The author should do a follow-up article which addresses these concerns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the article on wind turbines.  The author does not offer a better alternative to wind energy.  Does he favor solar energy or something else?  What about the energy involved with air pollution associated with air pollution from fossil fuels?  I am environmentally sensitive and only know all too personally the health effects of fossil fuels.  The author should do a follow-up article which addresses these concerns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
